- Christine Stewart, former Canadian Minister of the Environment
|Photo: Ileana Johnson 2016|
One of the first changes made by the new British Prime Minister, Theresa May, was to close the Department of Energy and Climate Change and to transfer it to a new office, the Department of Business, Energy, and Industrial Strategy, a transfer heavily criticized by environmental groups and its cheering main stream media who saw it as a disaster to end the lucrative climate change industry.
The new agency will be headed by Greg Clark who is believed to oppose wind power. Off shore companies are worried, in light of Brexit, that financing for their wind-generated energy projects, which depend heavily on subsidies to compete, will be affected.
U.K.’s Conservative Party has cut green subsidies to protect consumers and the industry from potential brownouts caused by insufficient energy on windless or cloudy days when they must depend on fossil fuel-generated electricity. Energy prices are so much higher that “38 percent of British households have cut back essential purchases, like food, to pay their energy bills.” http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/14/britain-shuts-down-its-global-warming-agency/#ixzz4Eral6yif
In this country, however, the climate change industry has nothing to fear, the Sustainable Development march, the lynchpin of Agenda 2030, continues unabated. Not only do they have nothing to fear, on the contrary, according to Michael Bastasch, the Democrat Party platform calls for prosecuting global warming skeptics.
“A provision is calling for the Department of Justice to investigate companies who disagree with Democrats on global warming science.” Following New York’s Attorney General Eric Schneidermann’s investigation into Exxon, “based on reporting from eco-left wing reporters at InsideClimate News and Columbia University,” Republicans countered that, “if minimization is fraud, exaggeration is fraud” too. http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/07/dem-party-platform-calls-for-prosecuting-global-warming-skeptics/#ixzz4Ct2SmEol
But global warming/climate change industry is just the tip of the iceberg of the 17-item Agenda 2030 proposed and pushed by the United Nations which has repackaged its original U.N. Agenda 21 of 1992 into a steroidal Agenda 2030 that will control the planet under the same excuse of Sustainable Development, Green Growth/Smart Growth everything. It is nothing but a redistribution of wealth from the haves to the have nots. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs
Because they have failed so far to control climate change and wipe out poverty, no matter how many trillions the western world has distributed to the third world, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon enlisted this time the help of six largest ad agencies, WPP, Omnicom Group Inc., Publicis Groupe SA, Interpublic Group, Dentsu, and Havas to promote U.N.’s Sustainable Development program. Funding is a problem as the developing nations depend largely on donated funds.
The United Nations hopes that these ad companies will convince their customers around the world to buy into supporting U.N.’s global objectives even though the citizens of this country have not been asked to vote on nor approve such economy-destroying goals. http://www.wsj.com/articles/ad-chiefs-unite-to-support-u-n-sustainable-development-program-1466726404?mod=djemCMOToday
On the tail of Brexit, a nine-page report has been published by the leaders of Germany, France, and Italy in Berlin to morph EU from the original free trade between countries mission into a super state. “Our countries share a common destiny and a common set of values that give rise to an even closer union between our citizens. We will therefore strive for a political union in Europe and invite the next Europeans to participate in this venture.” http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/683739/EU-referendum-German-French-European-superstate-Brexit
As the population demographics and the face of Europe are changing fast, it is uncertain that future Europeans will share a common set of values in a mammoth super state.
Succeeding in this post-Brexit EU as “super state” compact, will make it much easier to impose United Nation’s Agenda 2030 onto the globe and thus control everything its population does.
What does the U.N. really want to do? According to Tom DeWeese, President of American Policy Center, who is spearheading an effort to get us out of U.N., believes that “UN is driving to enforce global policies that would:
- Tax us without representation and set up a global IRS.
- Create an international police force that would threaten the independence and security of our nation.
- Create its own court system with no right to trial by jury of our peers, with a special focus on prosecuting “right wing extremists” (that means you and me!).
- Interfere with our Constitutional form of government through a series of international treaties.
- Ram thousands of ‘refugees” from the hate-America Islamist Third World into our cities and towns, overriding the objections of American citizens.”
- It is not the climate or global warming that the global elitist cabal is interested in, since nature does not need saving. As Paul Hellyer, former Canadian Defense Minister, said in a video, “The end game is a new world order” and you and I are not invited at the table or in the house of trillions for that matter.
Tom DeWeese explained that, “In a recent interview with a publication called Business Green, the U.N.’s Climate Change Czar, Christiana Figueres said, ‘I think it is very important to understand that we will only pursue climate goals through the national pursuit of SDG.”’
SDG refers to Sustainable Development Goals, the 17 goals outlined in United Nation’s Agenda 2030. She admits that Agenda 2030 is “U.N.’s ‘ONLY’ policy vehicle to enforce massive rules and regulations over our nation, our states, our cities, and towns,” all hidden under the guise of “environmental protection.” https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs
Anyone who studied the subject understands that increased solar flares, decreased solar flares, oceanic currents, and volcanic eruptions have tremendous effect on weather and climate, not human activity.
Our Secretary of State, John Kerry, said in a candid moment, “If all the industrial nations went down to zero [carbon dioxide] emissions, it wouldn’t be enough. Not when more than 65 percent of the world’s ‘carbon pollution’ comes from the developing world.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAtiygrbTSg
Geoengineering, i.e., “stratospheric aerosol injection,” (SAI), is seeding the stratosphere with “particles that reflect the sun’s heat in much the same way volcanic eruptions do.” SAI spraying of the stratosphere has already been underway. At the same time, chemtrails have been dubbed conspiracy theories despite visual and physical evidence. SAI is done “to give the global economy more time to transition from fossil fuels,” said Brennan. “A fully deployed SAI would cost $10 billion yearly.” Of course, greenhouse gas emission reductions would still have to accompany SAIs because, he added, “SAI alone would not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.”
“The technology has the potential to alter the weather patterns of some regions of the world at the expense of other regions of the world; this could trigger sharp opposition by some nations.” How much aluminum and other toxic particles are falling from the chemtrail-seeding in the sky onto our roads, crops, land, homes, and how adversely are they affecting our health?
John Brennan, CIA Director, disclosed in June 2016 at the meeting of the Council on Foreign Relations that the technology is here, and seeding the stratosphere for weather modification to combat global warming is taking place around the globe. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmQMTfila7I
This massive social engineering of the entire planet will forever alter our way of life, what chemicals fall from the sky, the viability of our crops, water usage, electricity usage, where we live, how much space we occupy, whether we walk or bike to work/school, whether we go anywhere outside of a very small radius, our entire government, and entire societies will be transformed with U.N.’s Agenda 2030.
David Brower, founder of Friends of the Earth, said, “The goal now is a socialist, redistributionist society, which is nature’s proper steward and society’s only hope.” Having experienced this redistributionist socialist/communist society for myself, I can vehemently disagree with such a statement. Socialism/communism represents no hope; it is sheer misery and deprivation of everything that makes life worth living.